Sports betting by state: online, retail and none

Industry trackers report thirty-one states and the District of Columbia with statewide online sports betting, eight states with retail betting only and eleven with none. Each state decides for itself, and its own regulator is the authority.

Statuses follow regulator, statute and court sources where we could read them, and say so where a figure comes from trade press. Our newest reads are dated . We are independent and do not speak for any regulator. How we check

The three groups

The counts below are the ones industry trackers report as of November 11, 2026. They are secondary figures: a regulator's own page is the authority, and the register's state pages show what each regulator publishes.

Statewide online sports betting (31 states and DC). Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming.

Retail betting only (8 states). Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Washington and Wisconsin. Betting there takes place at a physical location, and no statewide online wagering is offered.

No legal sports betting (11 states). Alabama, Alaska, California, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Minnesota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas and Utah.

Two notes on the edges

Nebraska had an online sports wagering measure on the November 3, 2026 ballot. Press reports say voters rejected it; we read no official result, and the state stays in the retail group.

Wisconsin is reported two ways. One source calls online betting authorized but not live, and another calls the state retail only. The register follows the second description until a regulator page settles it.

The legal basis after Murphy v. NCAA

For decades the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act made it unlawful for a state to license or authorize sports betting, with grandfather provisions for four states. The Act did not make betting itself a federal crime, and it let the Attorney General and sports organizations sue to stop violations. The Supreme Court's opinion in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, decided May 14, 2018, concerned New Jersey's repeal of its own sports betting bans. The Court's report gives the case number as 16-476. The Court held that the provision barring states from authorizing sports gambling violates the anticommandeering principle, and the decision left the question of sports betting to each state.

That is why the map above is a map of state laws. There is no federal sports betting license, and the federal statutes that remain are covered in federal gambling law.

Regulators as trackers list them

The table shows the regulator for each online state as an industry tracker lists it. It is secondary information. Where our client could read the regulator's own site, the notes after the table say so.

StateRegulator (per industry trackers)
ArizonaDepartment of Gaming
ArkansasRacing Commission
ColoradoDivision of Gaming
ConnecticutDepartment of Consumer Protection
DelawareLottery
District of ColumbiaOffice of Lottery and Gaming
FloridaGaming Control Commission, with the Seminole compact
IllinoisGaming Board
IndianaGaming Commission
IowaRacing and Gaming Commission
KansasRacing and Gaming Commission
KentuckyHorse Racing and Gaming Corporation
LouisianaGaming Control Board
MaineGambling Control Unit
MarylandLottery and Gaming Control Agency
MassachusettsGaming Commission
MichiganGaming Control Board
MissouriGaming Commission
NevadaGaming Control Board
New HampshireLottery
New JerseyDivision of Gaming Enforcement
New YorkState Gaming Commission
North CarolinaState Lottery Commission
OhioCasino Control Commission
OregonLottery
PennsylvaniaGaming Control Board
Rhode IslandLottery
TennesseeSports Wagering Council
VermontDepartment of Liquor and Lottery
VirginiaLottery
West VirginiaLottery Commission
WyomingGaming Commission

What the regulators' own pages show

Four regulator pages were read on November 11, 2026, each after its robots.txt, and two sites refused our client.

  • Pennsylvania's Gaming Control Board has a page of online sports wagering operators that names eleven licensed brands and tells players to verify that a site is regulated by the Board.
  • The Massachusetts Gaming Commission says that Governor Baker signed the sports wagering act on August 10, 2022, and that General Laws chapter 23N creates three license categories: Category 1 for casinos, Category 2 for racetracks and simulcast centers, and Category 3 for online and mobile operators.
  • The Tennessee Sports Wagering Council lists its approved licensees with their license and renewal dates, and states that it is illegal to bet on sports in Tennessee with any operator not on the list.
  • Nevada's Gaming Control Board publishes a regulations document current as of September 17, 2026, and its contents include Regulation 22 on race books and sports pools.
  • Louisiana's gaming board site answered our client with an access denied error, and so did the Michigan Gaming Control Board's, so neither was read.

Frequently asked questions

Does a state with retail betting allow betting on a phone?

Not statewide. Retail only means that wagers are placed at a licensed physical location. The online group is the list above.

Is sports betting the same as an online casino license?

No. Most states with sports betting have not authorized online casino games, and seven license online casino. The state status table shows both.

Who decides whether a sportsbook is licensed?

The state regulator does. A site that does not appear on the regulator's list holds no license from that state, and Tennessee says so in plain words on its own page.